Benchmark: Destructuration vs direct access in filter

HTML Preparation code:

<!--your preparation HTML code goes here-->

Script Preparation code:

function generateUsers(count) {
    const users = [];
    for (let i = 0; i < count; i++) {
        const firstName = `FirstName${i}`;
        const lastName = `LastName${i}`;
        const username = `user${i}`;
        const email = `${username}@example.com`;

        users.push({
            firstName,
            lastName,
            username,
            email,
        });
    }
    return users;
}

const users = generateUsers(1000)

Tests:

Destructuration
users.find(({ email }) => email === 'user990@example.com');
Direct
users.find((user) => user.email === 'user990@example.com');

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Destructuration
Direct

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: one year ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/134.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 134 on Mac OS X 10.15.7

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
Destructuration	136670.9 Ops/sec
Direct	136441.0 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks:

Destructuration vs direct access in filter (version: 1)

Comparing performance of: Destructuration vs Direct

Created: one year ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

Destructuration

Direct

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A