Benchmark: Array constructor vs literal performance - 100000 itemslljkjlkjkjlkjjlj

Script Preparation code:

var n = 100000;

Tests:

Array constructor - 100000 items
var arr = new Array(n); for (var i = 0; i < n; i++) { arr[i] = new Array(); }
Array literal (assign by index) - 100000 items
var arr = []; for (var i = 0; i < n; i++) { arr[i] = []; }

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Array constructor - 100000 items
Array literal (assign by index) - 100000 items

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: one year ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:136.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/136.0

Browser/OS: Firefox 136 on Windows

View result in a separate tab

Array literal (assign by index) - 100000 items

90/s

Array constructor - 100000 items

73/s

View exact numbers

Test name	Executions per second
✓ Array literal (assign by index) - 100000 items	90 Ops/sec
Array constructor - 100000 items	73 Ops/sec

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model gpt-4o-mini, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

The benchmark presented compares the performance of two different methods for creating and populating arrays in JavaScript: using the `Array` constructor versus using array literals. Below is a detailed analysis of the benchmark, including the measures being compared, their pros and cons, as well as alternative options.

### Benchmark Overview

1. **Test Cases**:
   - **Array Constructor**:
     - **Code**: `var arr = new Array(n);for (var i = 0; i < n; i++) { arr[i] = new Array(); }`
     - **Test Name**: "Array constructor - 100000 items"
  
   - **Array Literal**:
     - **Code**: `var arr = [];for (var i = 0; i < n; i++) { arr[i] = []; }`
     - **Test Name**: "Array literal (assign by index) - 100000 items"

### Performance Results

The benchmark results indicate that:

- **Array Literal (assign by index)** has a performance of approximately **90.16 executions per second**.
- **Array Constructor** has a slightly lower performance of approximately **72.80 executions per second**.

### Comparison of Options

#### 1. **Array Constructor**
   - **Pros**: 
     - Can create an array of a specific size explicitly (like `new Array(n)`).
     - Useful when you want to guarantee the array starts with a defined length.
   - **Cons**: 
     - The performance can be slower when populating the array, particularly because it initializes the elements when the second step assigns new arrays.
     - More verbose and less common in modern JavaScript practices.

#### 2. **Array Literal**
   - **Pros**: 
     - More concise and easier to read.
     - Generally performs better in most JavaScript engines due to optimizations around simple array operations.
     - Commonly used in JavaScript, reflecting a practice familiar to many developers.
   - **Cons**: 
     - Does not explicitly define the length of the array initially, but this is typically not an issue in JavaScript since arrays are dynamic.

### Considerations

- **Memory Management**: The choice between these two methods can have implications in terms of memory usage and garbage collection, especially when working with larger arrays or when performance is critical.
  
- **Use Case**: The choice may depend on the specific context of use. For example, if you need an array of a predetermined size, an Array constructor can be appropriate, but for most casual uses, the array literal suffices.

### Alternative Options

Other methods for creating and populating arrays include:

- **Using `Array.from()`**: This method can create a new, shallow-copied Array instance from an array-like or iterable object. It can also take a mapping function as the second argument.
  
- **Using `Array.fill()`**: If you want to initialize an array with the same value, you can use `Array(n).fill(value)`, which creates an array of size `n` filled with the specified value.

- **Using the Spread Operator**: By combining it with other iterable sources like `Array(...Array(n).keys())`, developers can create and populate arrays more flexibly.

### Conclusion

This benchmark clearly illustrates the performance differences between two commonly used methods of creating arrays in JavaScript. Developers should consider the context and requirements of their applications before deciding which method to use, keeping in mind that the array literal approach is generally preferred for its simplicity and performance benefits.

Array constructor vs literal performance - 100000 itemslljkjlkjkjlkjjlj (version: 1)

Comparing performance of: `Array constructor - 100000 items vs Array literal (assign by index) - 100000 items`

Created: one year ago by: Guest

Go to the latest result

Array constructor - 100000 items

Array literal (assign by index) - 100000 items

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model gpt-4o-mini, generated one year ago):

Array constructor vs literal performance - 100000 itemslljkjlkjkjlkjjlj (version: 1)

Comparing performance of: Array constructor - 100000 items vs Array literal (assign by index) - 100000 items

Created: one year ago by: Guest

Go to the latest result

Array constructor - 100000 items

Array literal (assign by index) - 100000 items

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model gpt-4o-mini, generated one year ago):

Related benchmarks

Comparing performance of: `Array constructor - 100000 items vs Array literal (assign by index) - 100000 items`