Benchmark: looping through arrayLike 2

HTML Preparation code:

<p id="p">hello</p>

Script Preparation code:

'use strict';
let p = document.getElementById('p')
for(let i = 1000; i--;) p.appendChild(document.createElement('p'))
function myFunc(node) {
node.remove()
}

Tests:

[].forEach.call
[].forEach.call(p.getElementsByTagName('*'), myFunc)
for...of
for(let node of p.getElementsByTagName('*'))node.remove()

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
[].forEach.call
for...of

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: one year ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; CrOS x86_64 14541.0.0) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/132.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 132 on Chrome OS 14541.0.0

View result in a separate tab

[].forEach.call

3.3M/s

for...of

3.1M/s

View exact numbers

Test name	Executions per second
✓ [].forEach.call	3,282,094 Ops/sec
for...of	3,134,957 Ops/sec

looping through arrayLike 2 (version: 1)

Comparing performance of: `[].forEach.call vs for...of`

Created: one year ago by: Guest

Go to the latest result

[].forEach.call

for...of

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

looping through arrayLike 2 (version: 1)

Comparing performance of: [].forEach.call vs for...of

Created: one year ago by: Guest

Go to the latest result

[].forEach.call

for...of

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Related benchmarks

Comparing performance of: `[].forEach.call vs for...of`