Benchmark: Array ops - for-each vs double map-filter

HTML Preparation code:

<!--your preparation HTML code goes here-->

Script Preparation code:

/*your preparation JavaScript code goes here
To execute async code during the script preparation, wrap it as function globalMeasureThatScriptPrepareFunction, example:*/
async function globalMeasureThatScriptPrepareFunction() {}

Tests:

For-Each
const exampleObjects = Array.from(Array(1000)).map((_, i) => { const randomId = Math.round(Math.random() * 100); const otherRandomId = Math.round(Math.random() * 100); return { objectId: i % 3 === 0 ? undefined : randomId.toString(), clientObjectId: i % 4 === 0 ? undefined : otherRandomId.toString(), } }); const objectIds = new Set(exampleObjects.map(i => i.objectId).filter(i => i !== undefined)); const clientObjectIds = new Set(exampleObjects.map(i => i.clientObjectId).filter(i => i !== undefined));
map + filter twice
const exampleObjects = Array.from(Array(1000)).map((_, i) => { const randomId = Math.round(Math.random() * 100); const otherRandomId = Math.round(Math.random() * 100); return { objectId: i % 3 === 0 ? undefined : randomId.toString(), clientObjectId: i % 4 === 0 ? undefined : otherRandomId.toString(), } }); const objectIds = new Set(); const clientObjectIds = new Set(); for (const i of exampleObjects) { if (i.objectId) objectIds.add(i.objectId); if (i.clientObjectId) clientObjectIds.add(i.clientObjectId); }

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
For-Each
map + filter twice

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: one year ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/134.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 134 on Mac OS X 10.15.7

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
For-Each	16738.5 Ops/sec
map + filter twice	20723.4 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks:

Array ops - for-each vs double map-filter (version: 1)

Comparing performance of: For-Each vs map + filter twice

Created: one year ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

For-Each

map + filter twice

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A