Benchmark: calcTriangleCount vs calcSegments

HTML Preparation code:

calcTriangleCount vs calcSegments

Script Preparation code:

var N = 1000000;
var x = new Float32Array(N);
var y = new Float32Array(N);
var z = new Float32Array(N);

for (var i = 0; i < N; ++i) {
    x[i] = 100 * Math.random();
    y[i] = Math.random();
    z[i] = Math.random();
}

function calcTriangleCount(r, tolerance, zoom) {
    return Math.PI / Math.acos(1 - (tolerance * zoom) / r);
}

function calcSegments(r, tolerance, scale) {
    return 2 * Math.sqrt((2 * (r * scale)) / tolerance);
}

Tests:

calcTriangleCount
for (var i = 0; i < N; ++i) { calcTriangleCount(x[i], z[i], y[i]); }
calcSegments
for (var i = 0; i < N; ++i) { calcSegments(x[i], z[i], y[i]); }

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
calcTriangleCount
calcSegments

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: one year ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/132.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 132 on Windows

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
calcTriangleCount	316.4 Ops/sec
calcSegments	315.0 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks:

calcTriangleCount vs calcSegments (version: 1)

calcTriangleCount vs calcSegments

Comparing performance of: calcTriangleCount vs calcSegments

Created: one year ago by: Registered User

Jump to the latest result

calcTriangleCount

calcSegments

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A