Benchmark: Modulo VS bitwise AND for finding odd number

HTML Preparation code:

<!--your preparation HTML code goes here-->

Script Preparation code:

function getRandomArray() {
    const arr = [];
    for (let i = 0; i < 10000; i++) {
        Math.floor(Math.random() * 100000) + 1;
    }
    return arr;
}

var randomArr = getRandomArray()

Tests:

Modulo
const x = randomArr.map(x => x % 2 === 1)
bitwise AND
const y = randomArr.map(x => x & 1 === 1)

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Modulo
bitwise AND

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 2 months ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:151.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/151.0

Browser/OS: Firefox 151 on Windows

View result in a separate tab

Modulo

143.9M/s

bitwise AND

142.1M/s

View exact numbers

Test name	Executions per second
✓ Modulo	143,875,936 Ops/sec
bitwise AND	142,113,408 Ops/sec

Modulo VS bitwise AND for finding odd number (version: 1)

Comparing performance of: `Modulo vs bitwise AND`

Created: one year ago by: Registered User

Go to the latest result

Modulo

bitwise AND

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Modulo VS bitwise AND for finding odd number (version: 1)

Comparing performance of: Modulo vs bitwise AND

Created: one year ago by: Registered User

Go to the latest result

Modulo

bitwise AND

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Related benchmarks

Comparing performance of: `Modulo vs bitwise AND`