RegEx.test vs. String.includes (end of string matching) (version: 1)

Comparing performance of: regex.test vs string.includes

Created: one year ago by: Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
Script Preparation code:
Tests:

  • regex.test

  • string.includes

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results
  • Test case name Result
    regex.test
    string.includes

    Fastest: N/A

    Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:
Run details: (Test run date: 6 months ago)
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:144.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/144.0
Firefox 144 on Linux
View result in a separate tab
Test name Executions per second
regex.test 37964440.0 Ops/sec
string.includes 2119081728.0 Ops/sec
Related benchmarks: