Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
for...of (no break) vs find()
(version: 1)
Testing the difference between native loops and find()
Comparing performance of:
for..of vs Array.find()
Created:
one year ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<div id='test'></div>
Tests:
for..of
var arr = ['hello', 'a', 'b']; let val; for (var value of arr) { if (value === 'b') { val = value; } }
Array.find()
var arr = ['hello', 'a', 'b']; let val = arr.find(node => node.id === 'b');
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
for..of
Array.find()
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
Run details:
(Test run date:
one year ago
)
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/131.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Browser/OS:
Chrome 131 on Mac OS X 10.15.7
View result in a separate tab
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
Test name
Executions per second
for..of
146496000.0 Ops/sec
Array.find()
160948016.0 Ops/sec
Related benchmarks:
find() vs for...of vs for-loop
For-loop vs For-Of vs Array.find
for vs find 333333
find() vs for...of vs for-loop with large arrays
find() vs for...of vs for-loop 2
for...in vs for...of vs for-loop
find() vs for...of vs for-loop v2
for with break vs Array.find()
find() vs for...of vs for-loop 2222
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?