Benchmark: array copy set vs block vs per item

HTML Preparation code:

<!--your preparation HTML code goes here-->

Script Preparation code:

const arr1 = new Float64Array([1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9]);
const arr2 = new Float64Array([1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9]);

Tests:

set
arr1.set(arr2)
block
[ arr1[0], arr1[1], arr1[2], arr1[3], arr1[4], arr1[5], arr1[6], arr1[7], arr1[8], ]=arr2
per item
arr1[0] = arr2[0]; arr1[1] = arr2[1]; arr1[2] = arr2[2]; arr1[3] = arr2[3]; arr1[4] = arr2[4]; arr1[5] = arr2[5]; arr1[6] = arr2[6]; arr1[7] = arr2[7]; arr1[8] = arr2[8];

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
set
block
per item

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: one year ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/134.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 134 on Windows

View result in a separate tab

per item

94.8M/s

set

39.7M/s

block

25.4M/s

View exact numbers

Test name	Executions per second
✓ per item	94,770,600 Ops/sec
set	39,651,528 Ops/sec
block	25,414,050 Ops/sec

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model gpt-4o-mini, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

The benchmark "array copy set vs block vs per item" is designed to compare the performance of three different methods for copying elements from one `Float64Array` to another in JavaScript. The test focuses on how efficiently different assignment techniques can handle this task.

### Benchmark Test Cases:

1. **Set Method (`arr1.set(arr2)`)**:
   - **Description**: Utilizes the built-in `set` method provided by `TypedArray` (in this case, `Float64Array`). This method copies the entire contents of one array (`arr2`) into another (`arr1`) in a single operation.
   - **Pros**: 
     - Optimized for performance as it leverages internal methods potentially optimized by the JavaScript engine.
     - More concise and readable compared to manual copying.
   - **Cons**:
     - Less flexible for partial copying or complex conditions (e.g., copying only certain elements).

2. **Block Assignment**:
   - **Description**: This method utilizes a block of code to assign values from `arr2` to `arr1` using a single line for multiple assignments.
   - **Pros**: 
     - Can be more explicit about the indices being copied.
     - In some scenarios, may provide a better performance than item-by-item assignment due to reduced function call overhead.
   - **Cons**:
     - Typically less optimized than the `set` method, especially if the JavaScript engine cannot optimize it effectively.
     - Still requires multiple operations, which may not be as fast as the optimized `set` method.

3. **Per Item Assignment**:
   - **Description**: This uses a loop-like assignment where elements are copied one at a time, explicitly assigning each item from `arr2` to `arr1`.
   - **Pros**:
     - Very clear and explicit, making it easy to understand the behavior of each assignment.
     - Offers the most flexibility for custom copying logic.
   - **Cons**:
     - The least performant of the three methods when dealing with large datasets due to the overhead of repeated operations and potential JavaScript engine optimizations not being utilized.

### Performance Results:

Based on the latest benchmark results:
- **Per Item (Execution Speed: 94,770,600 ops/sec)**: This method performed the best, which is somewhat counterintuitive given its apparent resource intensiveness, possibly due to how the JavaScript engine optimally handles such cases in the latest versions.
- **Set (Execution Speed: 39,651,528 ops/sec)**: The `set` method comes in second, which is still quite efficient and demonstrates good performance.
- **Block (Execution Speed: 25,414,050 ops/sec)**: The block method performed the worst, which aligns with the expectation that it is not as optimized as the others.

### Other Considerations:

- Using built-in methods like `set` is generally recommended when maximum performance and readability are desired.
- It's crucial to consider that performance can vary not only based on the method used but also based on the JavaScript engine and execution environment. For example, different browsers or versions may yield varying results.
- Alternatives to arrays could include using libraries for immutability (like Immutable.js) or advanced data structures that may provide specific performance improvements or functionalities beyond raw speed.

In summary, this benchmark illustrates the performance landscape of different array copying techniques in JavaScript, notably how the language's engines can optimize certain methods, and offers insights into their practical use within real-world applications.

array copy set vs block vs per item (version: 1)

Comparing performance of: `set vs block vs per item`

Created: one year ago by: Guest

Go to the latest result

set

block

per item

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model gpt-4o-mini, generated one year ago):

array copy set vs block vs per item (version: 1)

Comparing performance of: set vs block vs per item

Created: one year ago by: Guest

Go to the latest result

set

block

per item

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model gpt-4o-mini, generated one year ago):

Related benchmarks

Comparing performance of: `set vs block vs per item`