Benchmark: for..of vs for vs flatMap

HTML Preparation code:

<!--your preparation HTML code goes here-->

Script Preparation code:

 var arr = [];
 var size = 1000;
 var size_n = 100;
 for (let i = 0; i < size; i++) {
     const innerData = [];
     for (let j = 0; j < 2; j++) { // Still 2 sub-arrays per data
         const subArray = [];
         for (let k = 0; k < size_n; k++) {
             subArray.push(i * size_n + j * size_n + k); // Unique values
         }
         innerData.push(subArray);
     }
     arr.push({
         data: innerData
     });
 }

Tests:

for
var result = []; for (let i = 0; i < arr.length; i++) { const data = arr[i].data; for (let j = 0; j < data.length; j++) { const subArray = data[j]; for (let k = 0; k < subArray.length; k++) { result.push(subArray[k]); } } }
for of
var result = []; for (let item of arr) { for (let subArray of item.data) { for (let element of subArray) { result.push(element); } } }
flatMap
arr.flatMap(x => x.data).flat()
flatMap(n)
arr.map(x => x.data).flat(2);

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
for
for of
flatMap
flatMap(n)

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: one year ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/134.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 134 on Windows

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
for	955.3 Ops/sec
for of	811.4 Ops/sec
flatMap	369.5 Ops/sec
flatMap(n)	365.1 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks:

for..of vs for vs flatMap (version: 4)

Comparing performance of: for vs for of vs flatMap vs flatMap(n)

Created: one year ago by: Registered User

Jump to the latest result

for

for of

flatMap

flatMap(n)

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A