Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Object speard vs assign
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Speard vs Assign
Created:
7 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
var objA = { a: '1', b: '2' } var objB = { c: '3', d: '4' }
Tests:
Speard
const objSpeard = { ...objA, ...objB }
Assign
const objAssign = Object.assign({}, objA, objB)
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Speard
Assign
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
I'd be happy to help you understand what's being tested in the provided JSON. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark is designed to compare two approaches for creating objects with merged properties: 1. **Spread operator (Speard)**: `const objSpeard = { ...objA, ...objB }` 2. **`Object.assign()` method**: `const objAssign = Object.assign({}, objA, objB)` **What is being tested?** The benchmark is testing the performance difference between these two approaches on different browsers and devices. **Options compared** The main options being compared are: * Spread operator (Speard) * `Object.assign()` method **Pros and Cons of each approach:** 1. **Spread Operator (Speard)**: * Pros: + More concise and readable code + Less error-prone, as it's harder to make mistakes when using spread operators * Cons: + May have slower performance due to the way browsers handle object creation 2. **`Object.assign()` method**: * Pros: + May have faster performance due to the way `Object.assign()` is optimized in modern browsers * Cons: + More verbose code, which can make it harder to read and maintain + More error-prone, as there's a chance of incorrect assignment or errors with nested objects **Other considerations:** The benchmark also considers other factors such as: * Device platform (Desktop vs. unknown) * Browser version (Chrome 67) **Library usage** There is no explicit library usage in the benchmark definition. **Special JavaScript features or syntax** No special JavaScript features or syntax are used in the benchmark. **Other alternatives** If you want to create objects with merged properties, there are other approaches available: 1. **Using a function**: `function createObject() { return { ...objA, ...objB }; }` 2. **Using `Object.merge()` (if available)**: `const objMerge = Object.merge({}, objA, objB);` (Note: This method is not supported in all browsers) Keep in mind that the spread operator and `Object.assign()` method are the most widely supported and efficient ways to create objects with merged properties. I hope this explanation helps you understand what's being tested in the benchmark!
Related benchmarks:
Variable assignment from object | traditional vs destructuring
Spread vs Object.assign (modify ) vs Object.assign (new)
object.assign vs spread to create a copy
object spread vs Object.assign
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?