Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
filter(_ => !!_) vs filter(Boolean) vs filter(v => v != null)
(version: 1)
Comparing performance of:
filter(_ => _) vs filter(Boolean) vs filter(v => v != null)
Created:
one year ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script type="text/javascript" src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.15/lodash.min.js"></script>
Script Preparation code:
var elements = [0, 1, false, 2, '', 3];
Tests:
filter(_ => _)
elements.filter(_ => !!_)
filter(Boolean)
elements.filter(Boolean)
filter(v => v != null)
elements.filter(v => v != null)
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (3)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
filter(_ => _)
filter(Boolean)
filter(v => v != null)
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
Run details:
(Test run date:
5 months ago
)
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/142.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Browser/OS:
Chrome 142 on Linux
View result in a separate tab
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
Test name
Executions per second
filter(_ => _)
25377710.0 Ops/sec
filter(Boolean)
25510924.0 Ops/sec
filter(v => v != null)
29747750.0 Ops/sec
Related benchmarks:
filter vs compact
lodash filter vs array.filter
filter vs compact vs flat
_.compact vs filter(Boolean)
_.compact vs filter(Boolean) vs filter(element => element)
Lodash Filter vs Native Filter with Empty Check
lodash.filter vs js native
Lodash.filter vs Lodash.without vs array.filter
filter(_ => _) vs filter(Boolean)
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?