Benchmark: computedStyleMap vs getComputedStyle (once v2)

HTML Preparation code:

<div class="foo"></div>

Tests:

getComputedStyle
var i = 1; var el = document.querySelector(".foo"); while (i--) { window.getComputedStyle(el).color }
computedStyleMap
var i = 1; var el = document.querySelector(".foo"); while (i--) { el.computedStyleMap().color }

Historical Performance Data aggregated from 5 community runs

Desktop Results:

Chrome 5 runs

computedStyleMap

12.8M/s

getComputedStyle

1.6M/s

Fastest: computedStyleMap (7.8x faster)

View exact numbers

✓ computedStyleMap: 12,807,623 ops/sec
• getComputedStyle: 1,633,346 ops/sec

Results show median performance across all community submissions. Run this benchmark yourself to verify on your device.

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
getComputedStyle
computedStyleMap

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 9 months ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/142.0.0.0 Safari/537.36 Edg/142.0.0.0

Browser/OS: Chrome 142 on Windows

View result in a separate tab

computedStyleMap

7.8M/s

getComputedStyle

1.2M/s

View exact numbers

Test name	Executions per second
✓ computedStyleMap	7,782,348 Ops/sec
getComputedStyle	1,234,720 Ops/sec

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model gpt-4o-mini, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

This benchmark compares two methods for retrieving the computed styles of an HTML element in the browser: `getComputedStyle` and `computedStyleMap`. The goal is to evaluate their performance and to understand the pros and cons of each approach.

### Benchmark Overview

The benchmark runs two tests:

1. **`getComputedStyle`**: A traditional method to obtain the computed style of an element. The test executes this method in a loop to measure how many times it can retrieve the color property of an element with the class `.foo`.

2. **`computedStyleMap`**: A newer method that returns a `CSSStyleValueMap` representing all computed CSS properties in a structured format. This also retrieves the color property but does so in a way that allows developers to access more detailed information about individual style properties.

### Performance Results

The benchmark results indicate the performance of each method in terms of executions per second:

- **`computedStyleMap`**: 12,807,623 executions per second
- **`getComputedStyle`**: 1,633,346.125 executions per second

The numbers reveal that `computedStyleMap` is significantly faster than `getComputedStyle` in this specific test.

### Pros and Cons of Each Method

#### `getComputedStyle`
- **Pros**:
  - Widely supported across all modern browsers and has a long-standing presence in web development.
  - Straightforward to use for retrieving a specific CSS property value.

- **Cons**:
  - Performance is comparatively lower, especially in cases where frequent style calculations are needed.
  - Returns a string value for style properties, which may require parsing for complex types or calculations.

#### `computedStyleMap`
- **Pros**:
  - Offers better performance as seen in the benchmark results.
  - Provides a structured representation of CSS properties, allowing easier manipulation and access to specific attributes or values.
  - Supports new CSS value types directly, enhancing the ability to work with different types of CSS properties.

- **Cons**:
  - May not be as familiar to developers who are used to `getComputedStyle`, requiring some ramp-up time to fully understand and adopt.
  - Since it's newer, there may be limited support in older browsers or edge cases where fallback methods are necessary.

### Considerations

When using either approach, consider the browser compatibility requirements for your project. While most modern browsers support `computedStyleMap`, some older versions or niche browsers may only support `getComputedStyle`. Additionally, while the performance advantage of `computedStyleMap` is notable, profiling the actual performance improvements in the context of your specific application and use case is advised.

### Alternatives

In addition to these methods, other alternatives for manipulating or reading computed styles could include:

- **CSS Variables**: If a project is heavily reliant on dynamic styles, using CSS custom properties could be an alternative way to manage styles efficiently with JavaScript or CSS.
- **Element.style**: If styles are applied inline, accessing elements through the `style` property can provide immediate access to applied styles without needing to use either method.
- **CSS-in-JS Libraries**: Libraries like Styled Components or Emotion in React enable the creation of styled components that dynamically handle styles based on props.

Overall, the choice between these methods ultimately depends on the performance requirements of your application and the specificities of the styles being manipulated.

computedStyleMap vs getComputedStyle (once v2) (version: 1)

Comparing performance of: `getComputedStyle vs computedStyleMap`

Created: one year ago by: Guest

Go to the latest result

getComputedStyle

computedStyleMap

Historical Performance Data aggregated from 5 community runs

Desktop Results:

Chrome 5 runs

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model gpt-4o-mini, generated one year ago):

computedStyleMap vs getComputedStyle (once v2) (version: 1)

Comparing performance of: getComputedStyle vs computedStyleMap

Created: one year ago by: Guest

Go to the latest result

getComputedStyle

computedStyleMap

Historical Performance Data aggregated from 5 community runs

Desktop Results:

Chrome 5 runs

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model gpt-4o-mini, generated one year ago):

Related benchmarks

Comparing performance of: `getComputedStyle vs computedStyleMap`