Toggle navigation
MeasureThat
.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
comma vs semicolon
(version: 1)
Comparing performance of:
semicolon vs comma
Created:
one year ago
by:
Guest
Go to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<!--your preparation HTML code goes here-->
Tests:
semicolon
blur();blur();blur();blur();blur();blur();blur();blur();blur();blur();blur();blur();blur();blur();blur();blur();blur();blur();blur();blur();blur();blur();blur();blur();blur();blur();blur();blur();blur();blur();
comma
blur(),blur(),blur(),blur(),blur(),blur(),blur(),blur(),blur(),blur(),blur(),blur(),blur(),blur(),blur(),blur(),blur(),blur(),blur(),blur(),blur(),blur(),blur(),blur(),blur(),blur(),blur(),blur(),blur(),blur()
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
semicolon
comma
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
Run details:
(Test run date:
one year ago
)
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; CrOS x86_64 14541.0.0) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/132.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Browser/OS:
Chrome 132 on Chrome OS 14541.0.0
View result in a separate tab
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
semicolon
443K/s
comma
442K/s
View exact numbers
Test name
Executions per second
✓
semicolon
442,944 Ops/sec
comma
441,910 Ops/sec
Related benchmarks
Class vs Function
Merge vs Spread
fn vs afn
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?