Benchmark: [] + push vs new Array() + index insertion (random insertion order) (fixed)

HTML Preparation code:

<!--your preparation HTML code goes here-->

Script Preparation code:

const ITEMS_COUNT = 100000
function shuffleArray(array) {
    for (var i = array.length - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
        var j = Math.floor(Math.random() * (i + 1));
        var temp = array[i];
        array[i] = array[j];
        array[j] = temp;
    }
  return array;
}
const ITEMS_IN_RANDOM_ORDER = shuffleArray(Array.from(Array(ITEMS_COUNT).keys()))

Tests:

[] + push
const arr = []; for (const i of ITEMS_IN_RANDOM_ORDER) { arr.push(i); }
new Array() + index insertion
const arr = new Array(ITEMS_COUNT) for (const i of ITEMS_IN_RANDOM_ORDER) { arr[i] = i }

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
[] + push
new Array() + index insertion

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 3 months ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:146.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/146.0

Browser/OS: Firefox 146 on Windows

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
[] + push	598.1 Ops/sec
new Array() + index insertion	91.7 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks:

[] + push vs new Array() + index insertion (random insertion order) (fixed) (version: 1)

Comparing performance of: [] + push vs new Array() + index insertion

Created: one year ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

[] + push

new Array() + index insertion

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A