RegEx.test vs. String.includes vs. String.match late match (version: 1)

Comparing performance of: RegEx.test vs String.includes vs String.match

Created: one year ago by: Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
Tests:

  • RegEx.test

  • String.includes

  • String.match

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results
  • Test case name Result
    RegEx.test
    String.includes
    String.match

    Fastest: N/A

    Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:
Run details: (Test run date: one year ago)
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/605.1.15 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/18.3 Safari/605.1.15
Safari 18 on Mac OS X 10.15.7
View result in a separate tab
Test name Executions per second
RegEx.test 407645632.0 Ops/sec
String.includes 46120600.0 Ops/sec
String.match 20578666.0 Ops/sec
Related benchmarks: