Benchmark: for() vs foreach()

HTML Preparation code:

<div class="test">01</div>
<div class="test">02</div>
<div class="test">03</div>
<div class="test">04</div>
<div class="test">05</div>
<div class="test">06</div>
<div class="test">07</div>
<div class="test">08</div>
<div class="test">09</div>
<div class="test">10</div>

Script Preparation code:

var testsum = 0;

Tests:

forEach()
document.querySelectorAll(".test").forEach(() => { testsum++; });
for()
var testelement = document.querySelectorAll(".test"); for(var i = 0; i < testelement.length; i++) { testsum++; }

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
forEach()
for()

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: one year ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/132.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 132 on Windows

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
forEach()	320317.4 Ops/sec
for()	592276.6 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks:

for() vs foreach() (version: 1)

for() vs foreach()

Comparing performance of: forEach() vs for()

Created: one year ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

forEach()

for()

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A