Benchmark: grthyvar vs let vs const

HTML Preparation code:

<!--your preparation HTML code goes here-->

Script Preparation code:

let arr = Array(30).fill(()=>{})

Tests:

var
for(var o of arr) o()
let
for(let o of arr) o()
const
for(const o of arr) o()
outside - var
var o for(o of arr) o()
outside - let
let o for(o of arr) o()
global
for(o of arr) o()

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
var
let
const
outside - var
outside - let
global

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: one year ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 10; K) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/132.0.0.0 Safari/537.36 OPR/87.0.0.0

Browser/OS: Opera 87 on Android

View result in a separate tab

let

8.9M/s

outside - var

8.9M/s

outside - let

8.8M/s

const

8.8M/s

var

8.4M/s

global

66K/s

View exact numbers

Test name	Executions per second
✓ let	8,886,152 Ops/sec
outside - var	8,873,713 Ops/sec
outside - let	8,802,235 Ops/sec
const	8,777,386 Ops/sec
var	8,386,393 Ops/sec
global	65,923 Ops/sec

grthyvar vs let vs const (version: 1)

Comparing performance of: `var vs let vs const vs outside - var vs outside - let vs global`

Created: one year ago by: Guest

Go to the latest result

var

let

const

outside - var

outside - let

global

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

grthyvar vs let vs const (version: 1)

Comparing performance of: var vs let vs const vs outside - var vs outside - let vs global

Created: one year ago by: Guest

Go to the latest result

var

let

const

outside - var

outside - let

global

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Related benchmarks

Comparing performance of: `var vs let vs const vs outside - var vs outside - let vs global`