Benchmark: luxon vs datefns vs moment toDate

HTML Preparation code:

<script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/luxon@1.26.0/build/global/luxon.min.js"></script>
<script src="https://igor.moomers.org/random/datefns.js"></script>
<script src='https://momentjs.com/downloads/moment-with-locales.min.js'></script>
<script src='https://momentjs.com/downloads/moment-timezone-with-data-10-year-range.min.js'></script>

Script Preparation code:

window.ds = "2020-02-19T00:51:53.623839+00:00";

Tests:

datefns
window.datefns.parseISO(window.ds)
luxon
luxon.DateTime.fromISO(ds);
moment-timezone
moment.utc(ds).toDate()

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
datefns
luxon
moment-timezone

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: one year ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/135.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 135 on Windows

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
datefns	466836.9 Ops/sec
luxon	278951.6 Ops/sec
moment-timezone	94708.3 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks:

luxon vs datefns vs moment toDate (version: 1)

Comparing performance of: datefns vs luxon vs moment-timezone

Created: one year ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

datefns

luxon

moment-timezone

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A