Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Error stack
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Stack vs Stack2
Created:
7 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
var a;
Tests:
Stack
a = new Error().stack;
Stack2
a = new Error().stack;
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Stack
Stack2
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
I'll break down the benchmark definition and test cases for you. **Benchmark Definition:** The provided JSON represents a simple JavaScript microbenchmark that measures the performance of creating an error object's `stack` property. The script preparation code is empty, which means no setup or initialization is required before running the benchmark. There are no HTML preparation codes either. **What is tested:** The benchmark tests how fast different JavaScript engines can create and access the `stack` property of an error object. The test creates a new Error object and assigns it to a variable 'a', then accesses the `stack` property on that object. **Options compared:** There are two test cases, "Stack" and "Stack2", which are identical in terms of the code being executed: ```javascript a = new Error().stack; ``` This means both tests compare the performance of accessing the `stack` property on an error object created by each engine. **Pros and Cons:** The pros of this approach are: * Simple and easy to understand * Quick benchmarking time due to minimal overhead * Focuses on a specific aspect of JavaScript execution However, there are some cons: * May not accurately represent real-world use cases that involve more complex error handling or logging scenarios * Limited scope in terms of the types of errors being tested (only Error objects) **Library and its purpose:** There is no library mentioned in the benchmark definition. The `Error` object is a built-in JavaScript class. **Special JS feature or syntax:** None are explicitly mentioned, but it's worth noting that the use of the dot notation (`new Error().stack`) to access the `stack` property on an error object is a common pattern in JavaScript. **Alternatives:** If you want to create more realistic benchmarks, consider alternatives such as: 1. Creating more complex error handling scenarios (e.g., try-catch blocks with different types of errors). 2. Using real-world logging libraries or frameworks. 3. Involving asynchronous operations or callbacks. 4. Adding more test cases to compare different aspects of JavaScript execution. Keep in mind that when it comes to benchmarking, the key is to isolate the specific aspect you want to measure and ensure that the tests are well-controlled and representative of real-world scenarios. For the provided benchmark, using a library like `console.error()` or a logging framework could provide more realistic results. However, this would require additional setup and may introduce more overhead, which might impact performance.
Related benchmarks:
Find: Native vs Underscore vs Lodash
Bind: Native vs Underscore vs Lodash
map: Native vs Underscore vs Lodash
Plain js vs OmitBy(3)
isType bench
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?