Benchmark: named vs positional arguments v1

HTML Preparation code:

<!--your preparation HTML code goes here-->

Script Preparation code:

const columns = Array.from({ length: 10 }, (_, i) => `column-${i}`)
const rows = Array.from({ length: 1_000 }, (_, i) => `row-${i}`)

function pargs(row, column) {
  return row.length + column.length;
}

function nargs({ row, column }) {
  return row.length + column.length;
}

Tests:

pargs
for (const row in rows) { for (const column in columns) { pargs(row, column) } }
nargs
for (const row in rows) { for (const column in columns) { nargs({ row, column }) } }

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
pargs
nargs

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: one year ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/132.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 132 on Mac OS X 10.15.7

View result in a separate tab

nargs

6K/s

pargs

6K/s

View exact numbers

Test name	Executions per second
✓ nargs	6,302 Ops/sec
pargs	6,290 Ops/sec

named vs positional arguments v1 (version: 1)

Comparing performance of: `pargs vs nargs`

Created: one year ago by: Guest

Go to the latest result

pargs

nargs

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

named vs positional arguments v1 (version: 1)

Comparing performance of: pargs vs nargs

Created: one year ago by: Guest

Go to the latest result

pargs

nargs

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Related benchmarks

Comparing performance of: `pargs vs nargs`