Benchmark: Rxjs-Filter vs JS-If

HTML Preparation code:

<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/rxjs/7.8.1/rxjs.umd.min.js'></script>

Script Preparation code:

/*your preparation JavaScript code goes here
To execute async code during the script preparation, wrap it as function globalMeasureThatScriptPrepareFunction, example:*/
async function globalMeasureThatScriptPrepareFunction() {
    // This function is optional, feel free to remove it.
    // await someThing();
}

Tests:

Filter
const stream = new rxjs.Subject(); stream.pipe( rxjs.operators.filter(v => v) ).subscribe(v => { console.log(v); }); stream.next(true); stream.next(false); stream.next(true);
If
const stream = new rxjs.Subject(); stream.subscribe(v => { if(v) { console.log(v); } }); stream.next(true); stream.next(false); stream.next(true);

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Filter
If

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: one year ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:134.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/134.0

Browser/OS: Firefox 134 on Windows

View result in a separate tab

107K/s

Filter

98K/s

View exact numbers

Test name	Executions per second
✓ If	107,095 Ops/sec
Filter	98,476 Ops/sec

Rxjs-Filter vs JS-If (version: 1)

Comparing performance of: `Filter vs If`

Created: one year ago by: Guest

Go to the latest result

Filter

If

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Rxjs-Filter vs JS-If (version: 1)

Comparing performance of: Filter vs If

Created: one year ago by: Guest

Go to the latest result

Filter

If

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Related benchmarks

Comparing performance of: `Filter vs If`