Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Mineaslidhfas
(version: 0)
<script src="//ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/3.1.1/jquery.min.js"></script>
Comparing performance of:
Jquery vs Js
Created:
7 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src="//ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/3.1.1/jquery.min.js"></script> <input type="text" id="originating-officer" name="originating-officer" value="Yes"></input>>
Tests:
Jquery
$("#originating-officer").prop('disabled', true);
Js
document.getElementById("originating-officer").disabled = true;
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Jquery
Js
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
gemma2:9b
, generated one year ago):
This benchmark compares two ways to disable an input field in HTML using JavaScript: one utilizing the jQuery library and another using native JavaScript methods. **Options Compared:** 1. **jQuery (`$("#originating-officer").prop('disabled', true);`):** - This approach uses jQuery, a popular JavaScript library that simplifies DOM manipulation and AJAX interactions. It selects the input field with the ID "originating-officer" and sets its `disabled` property to `true`. 2. **Native JavaScript (`document.getElementById("originating-officer").disabled = true;`):** - This method uses built-in JavaScript functions to achieve the same result. It directly accesses the input field element by ID using `document.getElementById`, then sets its `disabled` property to `true`. **Pros/Cons:** * **jQuery:** * **Pros:** More concise and potentially easier to read for developers familiar with jQuery syntax. jQuery often provides higher-level abstractions that can make coding simpler. * **Cons:** Introduces an external dependency (the jQuery library), which can increase the page's size and require extra downloads. * **Native JavaScript:** * **Pros:** No external dependencies, potentially faster execution as it avoids the overhead of loading and using jQuery. * **Cons:** Can sometimes be more verbose than jQuery syntax. **Other Considerations:** * **Project Context:** If a project already heavily utilizes jQuery, sticking with it for consistency might be preferable. However, if jQuery isn't being used elsewhere, going with native JavaScript keeps the project lightweight. * **Performance Differences:** In this specific case, the benchmark results indicate that native JavaScript is significantly faster (almost 3 times) than jQuery in disabling the input field. **Alternatives:** While not shown in the provided code, other approaches exist for disabling HTML elements: * Using CSS properties like `pointer-events` or `opacity` to visually disable the element without relying on JavaScript. * Utilizing HTML attributes directly (e.g., setting `disabled` attribute in the input tag). Let me know if you have any further questions.
Related benchmarks:
DOM Selection
native reverse find vs lodash _.findLast
querySelector vs getElementsByClassName
Deep clone comparison
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?