Benchmark: new Date().toISOString() vs moment.utc().toISOString();

HTML Preparation code:

<script src="https://cdn.rawgit.com/moment/moment/2.7.0/moment.js"></script>
<script src="https://cdn.rawgit.com/moment/moment-timezone/0.2.2/builds/moment-timezone-with-data.js"></script></script>

Script Preparation code:

var dateObject = new Date('2016-11-03T12:00:00Z');
var timezone = 'Australia/Perth';
var format = 'YYYY-MM-DDTHH:mm:ss';

Tests:

Moment
var newDateObject = moment.utc().toISOString();
native
var dateString = new Date().toISOString();

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Moment
native

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: one year ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/131.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 131 on Mac OS X 10.15.7

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
Moment	136768.1 Ops/sec
native	2829383.2 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks:

Moment Tests
Moment format vs new Date().toLocaleDateString()
Moment format vs new Date().toISOString, no ms
moment iostring
Moment Tests timestamp
Moment Tests timestamp 2
Moment Tests timestamp 2 millis
Moment UTC Tests
Moment and natvie toISOString()

new Date().toISOString() vs moment.utc().toISOString(); (version: 1)

Comparing performance of: Moment vs native

Created: one year ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

Moment

native

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A