Benchmark: RegEx.test vs. String.includes vs. String.match vs String.includes (using ||) (with multiple strings)

Script Preparation code:

const string = 'Outstanding';
const regex = /toda|bfi|coms|cot|cos|ipe|ips|rn|rm|ap|sf|st|sp|ss|sv|to|t|o|e|s/;
const searchStrings = ['toda', 'bfi', 'coms', 'cot', 'cos', 'ipe', 'ips', 'rn', 'rm', 'ap', 'sf', 'st', 'sp', 'ss', 'sv', 'to', 't', 'o', 'e', 's'];

Tests:

RegEx.test
/toda|bfi|coms|cot|cos|ipe|ips|rn|rm|ap|sf|st|sp|ss|sv|to|t|o|e|s/.test('Outstanding');
Iteration and String.includes
['toda', 'bfi', 'coms', 'cot', 'cos', 'ipe', 'ips', 'rn', 'rm', 'ap', 'sf', 'st', 'sp', 'ss', 'sv', 'to', 't', 'o', 'e', 's'].some(s => 'Outstanding'.includes(s));
String.match
'Outstanding'.match(/toda|bfi|coms|cot|cos|ipe|ips|rn|rm|ap|sf|st|sp|ss|sv|to|t|o|e|s/);
String.includes (using ||)
'Outstanding'.includes('toda') || 'Outstanding'.includes('bfi') || 'Outstanding'.includes('coms') || 'Outstanding'.includes('cot') || 'Outstanding'.includes('cos') || 'Outstanding'.includes('ipe') || 'Outstanding'.includes('ips') || 'Outstanding'.includes('rn') || 'Outstanding'.includes('rm') || 'Outstanding'.includes('ap') || 'Outstanding'.includes('sf') || 'Outstanding'.includes('st') || 'Outstanding'.includes('sp') || 'Outstanding'.includes('ss') || 'Outstanding'.includes('sv') || 'Outstanding'.includes('to') || 'Outstanding'.includes('t') || 'Outstanding'.includes('o') || 'Outstanding'.includes('e') || 'Outstanding'.includes('s');

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
RegEx.test
Iteration and String.includes
String.match
String.includes (using \|\|)

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: one year ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/131.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 131 on Windows

View result in a separate tab

RegEx.test

36.7M/s

String.match

24.0M/s

Iteration and String.includes

6.6M/s

String.includes (using ||)

6.6M/s

View exact numbers

Test name	Executions per second
✓ RegEx.test	36,688,956 Ops/sec
String.match	23,977,752 Ops/sec
Iteration and String.includes	6,574,238 Ops/sec
String.includes (using \|\|)	6,554,134 Ops/sec

RegEx.test vs. String.includes vs. String.match vs String.includes (using ||) (with multiple strings) (version: 1)

Comparing performance of: `RegEx.test vs Iteration and String.includes vs String.match vs String.includes (using ||)`

Created: one year ago by: Guest

Go to the latest result

RegEx.test

Iteration and String.includes

String.match

String.includes (using ||)

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

RegEx.test vs. String.includes vs. String.match vs String.includes (using ||) (with multiple strings) (version: 1)

Comparing performance of: RegEx.test vs Iteration and String.includes vs String.match vs String.includes (using ||)

Created: one year ago by: Guest

Go to the latest result

RegEx.test

Iteration and String.includes

String.match

String.includes (using ||)

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Related benchmarks

Comparing performance of: `RegEx.test vs Iteration and String.includes vs String.match vs String.includes (using ||)`