Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
RegEx.test vs. String.includes vs. String.match vs String.startsWith abc123
(version: 1)
Comparing performance of:
String.includes vs String.match vs String.startsWith
Created:
one year ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
var string = "Hello world!"; var regex = /Hello/;
Tests:
String.includes
string.includes("Hello");
String.match
string.match("Hello");
String.startsWith
string.startsWith("Hello");
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (3)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
String.includes
String.match
String.startsWith
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
Run details:
(Test run date:
one year ago
)
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/131.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Browser/OS:
Chrome 131 on Mac OS X 10.15.7
View result in a separate tab
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
<iframe src="https://measurethat.net/Embed?id=579346" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>
Test name
Executions per second
String.includes
146861024.0 Ops/sec
String.match
9297873.0 Ops/sec
String.startsWith
77159624.0 Ops/sec
Related benchmarks:
RegEx.test vs. String.includes vs. String.match
Regex check
RegEx.test vs. String.includes vs. String.match v2
RegEx.test vs. String.includes vs. String.match vs String.match(regex)
RegEx.test vs. String.includes vs. String.match vs. String.search
RegEx.test vs. String.includes vs. String.match vs String.match(regex) for starting string
RegEx.test vs. String.includes vs. String.match1
RegEx.test vs. String.includes vs. String.match(Regex)
RegEx.test vs. String.includes vs. String.match vs String.startsWith
RegEx.test vs. String.includes x 2
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?