Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Has Class With Cache
(version: 0)
Determining which method to check if an element has a specific class.
Comparing performance of:
ClassList Contains vs ClassName IndexOf vs Cached ClassName IndexOf
Created:
7 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<div class='test some more items and stuff here' id='test'></div>
Script Preparation code:
var elem = document.getElementById('test'); var cache = ' ' + elem.className + ' ';
Tests:
ClassList Contains
var has = elem.classList.contains('stuff');
ClassName IndexOf
var has = (' ' + elem.className + ' ').indexOf(' stuff ');
Cached ClassName IndexOf
var has = cache.indexOf(' stuff ');
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (3)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
ClassList Contains
ClassName IndexOf
Cached ClassName IndexOf
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided benchmark and explain what's being tested. **Overview** The benchmark is designed to compare three approaches for checking if an HTML element has a specific class: 1. `classList.contains()` method 2. `indexOf()` method on the element's `className` property 3. Using a cached version of the `className` value **Benchmark Definition JSON** The benchmark definition includes the following information: * **Name**: "Has Class With Cache" * **Description**: A brief explanation of the benchmark * **Script Preparation Code**: A JavaScript snippet that prepares the test environment by getting an HTML element with an ID of "test" and storing its class name in a variable called `cache` * **Html Preparation Code**: The corresponding HTML code for the test case, including the element with the specified class **Individual Test Cases** The benchmark includes three individual test cases: 1. **ClassList Contains** * This test uses the `classList.contains()` method to check if an element has a specific class. 2. **ClassName IndexOf** * This test uses the `indexOf()` method on the element's `className` property to find the index of the target class. 3. **Cached ClassName IndexOf** * This test uses the cached value of the `className` variable (prepared in the script) and searches for the target class using the `indexOf()` method. **Pros and Cons** Here are some general pros and cons of each approach: 1. **ClassList Contains** * Pros: Efficient, modern, and widely supported. * Cons: May not be as fast as other approaches on older browsers or with large element lists. 2. **ClassName IndexOf** * Pros: Can be faster than `classList.contains()` for very specific class names. * Cons: Requires concatenating the class name with a separator (in this case, a space), which may lead to slower performance. 3. **Cached ClassName IndexOf** * Pros: Can be faster than using `classList.contains()` if the same class is checked multiple times. * Cons: Requires storing and updating the cached value, which can add overhead. **Library** In this benchmark, the `classList` property is used on an HTML element, which is a part of the ECMAScript 5 standard. The `contains()` method is implemented in most modern browsers, making it a widely supported solution. **Special JS Feature or Syntax** The benchmark does not use any special JavaScript features or syntax that require a deep understanding of the language. However, it's worth noting that this approach assumes that the element has a class list property and that the `contains()` method is implemented correctly in the browser being tested. **Other Alternatives** Alternative approaches for checking if an HTML element has a specific class might include: 1. **QuerySelector()**: A more modern and efficient way to select elements based on their class names. 2. **Regular Expressions**: Using regular expressions to search for the target class name in the element's `className` property. 3. **DOM Traversal**: Using DOM traversal methods like `querySelectorAll()` or `getElementsByClassName()` to find matching elements. Keep in mind that these alternatives may have different performance characteristics and trade-offs, and may not be as widely supported as the original approach.
Related benchmarks:
Comparing speed of getting element by id with jQuery vs Vanilla JS
jQuery by id vs Document.getElementById +1
getElementById vs querySelector ID vs getElementsByClassName vs querySelectorAll
getElementById vs querySelector vs getElementsByTagName
getElementById vs querySelector ID vs getElementsByClassName vs querySelectorAll ver2
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?