Benchmark: Sanitize - MeasureThat.net

HTML Preparation code:

<!--your preparation HTML code goes here-->

Tests:

From preact sources
const strings = [ 'dsafsdafasdf', '>asdf<span>sdfsdf', 'sdfdsf&sdf"sdfadsfs\'sadf\nsadfasdf', '', '123#', ] const ENCODED_ENTITIES = /["&<]/ function encodeEntities(str) { // Skip all work for strings with no entities needing encoding: if (str.length === 0 || ENCODED_ENTITIES.test(str) === false) return str let last = 0, i = 0, out = '', ch = '' // Seek forward in str until the next entity char: for (; i < str.length; i++) { switch (str.charCodeAt(i)) { case 34: ch = '"' break case 38: ch = '&' break case 60: ch = '<' break default: continue } // Append skipped/buffered characters and the encoded entity: if (i !== last) out = out + str.slice(last, i) out = out + ch // Start the next seek/buffer after the entity's offset: last = i + 1 } if (i !== last) out = out + str.slice(last, i) return out } for (let i = 0; i < 100; i++) { strings.map(encodeEntities) }
Simple solution
const strings = [ 'dsafsdafasdf', '>asdf<span>sdfsdf', 'sdfdsf&sdf"sdfadsfs\'sadf\nsadfasdf', '', '123#', ] const sanitizeMap = { '<': '<', '>': '>', '"': '"', } const sanitize = value => { if (value === undefined || value == null) { return null } return String(value).replace(/[<>"]/g, char => sanitizeMap[char]) } for (let i = 0; i < 100; i++) { strings.map(sanitize) }
ChatGPT solution
const strings = [ 'dsafsdafasdf', '>asdf<span>sdfsdf', 'sdfdsf&sdf"sdfadsfs\'sadf\nsadfasdf', '', '123#', ] function sanitizeChatGPT(value) { if (!value) return '' return value .replace(/&/g, '&') .replace(/</g, '<') .replace(/>/g, '>') .replace(/"/g, '"') .replace(/'/g, ''') } for (let i = 0; i < 100; i++) { strings.map(sanitizeChatGPT) }

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
From preact sources
Simple solution
ChatGPT solution

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: one year ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:133.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/133.0

Browser/OS: Firefox 133 on Mac OS X 10.15

View result in a separate tab

From preact sources

27K/s

Simple solution

21K/s

ChatGPT solution

6K/s

View exact numbers

Test name	Executions per second
✓ From preact sources	26,838 Ops/sec
Simple solution	21,322 Ops/sec
ChatGPT solution	5,816 Ops/sec

Sanitize (version: 1)

Comparing performance of: `From preact sources vs Simple solution vs ChatGPT solution`

Created: one year ago by: Guest

Go to the latest result

From preact sources

Simple solution

ChatGPT solution

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Sanitize (version: 1)

Comparing performance of: From preact sources vs Simple solution vs ChatGPT solution

Created: one year ago by: Guest

Go to the latest result

From preact sources

Simple solution

ChatGPT solution

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Related benchmarks

Comparing performance of: `From preact sources vs Simple solution vs ChatGPT solution`