Benchmark: array vs Float64Array vs Float32Array (sort)

Script Preparation code:

var a = [...Array(10000)].map(_ => Math.random());
var ta = (new Float64Array(10000)).map(_ => Math.random());
var tb = (new Float32Array(10000)).map(_ => Math.random());

Tests:

array sort
a.sort();
Float64Array sort
ta.sort();
Float32Array sort
tb.sort();

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
array sort
Float64Array sort
Float32Array sort

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 4 months ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:150.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/150.0

Browser/OS: Firefox 150 on Windows

View result in a separate tab

Float32Array sort

9K/s

Float64Array sort

7K/s

array sort

1K/s

View exact numbers

Test name	Executions per second
✓ Float32Array sort	9,085 Ops/sec
Float64Array sort	7,033 Ops/sec
array sort	1,173 Ops/sec

array vs Float64Array vs Float32Array (sort) (version: 1)

Comparing performance of: `array sort vs Float64Array sort vs Float32Array sort`

Created: one year ago by: Guest

Go to the latest result

array sort

Float64Array sort

Float32Array sort

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

array vs Float64Array vs Float32Array (sort) (version: 1)

Comparing performance of: array sort vs Float64Array sort vs Float32Array sort

Created: one year ago by: Guest

Go to the latest result

array sort

Float64Array sort

Float32Array sort

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Related benchmarks

Comparing performance of: `array sort vs Float64Array sort vs Float32Array sort`