luxon vs dayjs vs date-fns vs temporal-polyfill (formatting) (version: 2)

Create and format dates from a timestamp

Comparing performance of: luxon v3.5.0 vs dayjs v1.11.13 vs date-fns v4.1.0 vs temporal-polyfill 0.2.5

Created: one year ago by: Registered User
Go to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
Script Preparation code:
Tests:

Historical Performance Data aggregated from 5 community runs

Desktop Results:
Chrome 5 runs
dayjs v1.11.13
1.3M/s
luxon v3.5.0
561K/s
date-fns v4.1.0
28K/s

Fastest: dayjs v1.11.13 (46.2x faster)

View exact numbers
  • ✓ dayjs v1.11.13: 1,313,391 ops/sec
  • • luxon v3.5.0: 560,830 ops/sec
  • • date-fns v4.1.0: 28,411 ops/sec

Results show median performance across all community submissions. Run this benchmark yourself to verify on your device.

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results
  • Test case name Result
    luxon v3.5.0
    dayjs v1.11.13
    date-fns v4.1.0
    temporal-polyfill 0.2.5

    Fastest: N/A

    Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:
Run details: (Test run date: 6 months ago)
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:147.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/147.0
Firefox 147 on Mac OS X 10.15
View result in a separate tab
dayjs v1.11.13
3.3M/s
luxon v3.5.0
857K/s
temporal-polyfill 0.2.5
43K/s
date-fns v4.1.0
42K/s
View exact numbers
Test name Executions per second
✓ dayjs v1.11.13 3,257,132 Ops/sec
luxon v3.5.0 856,661 Ops/sec
temporal-polyfill 0.2.5 42,701 Ops/sec
date-fns v4.1.0 42,066 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks