cached Intl.NumberFormat vs new Intl.NumberFormat vs toLocaleString currency number (version: 1)

Comparing performance of: cached Intl.NumberFormat vs new Intl.NumberFormat vs toLocaleString

Created: one year ago by: Registered User
Jump to the latest result
Tests:

  • cached Intl.NumberFormat

  • new Intl.NumberFormat

  • toLocaleString

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results
  • Test case name Result
    cached Intl.NumberFormat
    new Intl.NumberFormat
    toLocaleString

    Fastest: N/A

    Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:
Run details: (Test run date: one year ago)
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/130.0.0.0 YaBrowser/24.12.0.0 Safari/537.36
Yandex Browser 24 on Mac OS X 10.15.7
View result in a separate tab
Test name Executions per second
cached Intl.NumberFormat 4559317.5 Ops/sec
new Intl.NumberFormat 60884.7 Ops/sec
toLocaleString 63663.7 Ops/sec
Related benchmarks: