Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Lodash CloneDeep vs Immer Produce latest
(version: 1)
Comparing performance of:
Produce vs CloneDeep
Created:
one year ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/immer/dist/immer.umd.js"></script> <script src='https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/lodash/lodash.js'></script>
Script Preparation code:
state = { data: { data1: { data2: 'test' } } };
Tests:
Produce
const result = immer.produce(state, draft => { draft.data.data1.data2 = 'updated' })
CloneDeep
const result = _.cloneDeep(state); result.data.data1.data2 = 'updated';
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Produce
CloneDeep
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
Run details:
(Test run date:
one year ago
)
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/131.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Browser/OS:
Chrome 131 on Windows
View result in a separate tab
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
Test name
Executions per second
Produce
566170.2 Ops/sec
CloneDeep
2234528.2 Ops/sec
Related benchmarks:
Immer produce vs Lodash cloneDeep
Lodash CloneDeep vs Immer Produce
lodash get vs native javascript
Immer(produce) vs lodash(cloneDeep)
Lodash CloneDeep vs Immer Produce with heavy load
Immer produce vs Lodash cloneDeep 9
Immer produce vs Lodash cloneDeep 9(direct)
Ramda vs Lodash CloneDeep vs Immer Produce with heavy load
Immer vs Clone Deep
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?