Toggle navigation
MeasureThat
.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Lodash CloneDeep vs Immer Produce latest
(version: 1)
Comparing performance of:
Produce vs CloneDeep
Created:
one year ago
by:
Guest
Go to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/immer/dist/immer.umd.js"></script> <script src='https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/lodash/lodash.js'></script>
Script Preparation code:
state = { data: { data1: { data2: 'test' } } };
Tests:
Produce
const result = immer.produce(state, draft => { draft.data.data1.data2 = 'updated' })
CloneDeep
const result = _.cloneDeep(state); result.data.data1.data2 = 'updated';
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Produce
CloneDeep
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
Run details:
(Test run date:
one year ago
)
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/131.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Browser/OS:
Chrome 131 on Windows
View result in a separate tab
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
CloneDeep
2.2M/s
Produce
566K/s
View exact numbers
Test name
Executions per second
✓
CloneDeep
2,234,528 Ops/sec
Produce
566,170 Ops/sec
Related benchmarks
Lodash CloneDeep vs Immer Produce
Immer(produce) vs lodash(cloneDeep)
Lodash CloneDeep vs Immer Produce with heavy load
Ramda vs Lodash CloneDeep vs Immer Produce with heavy load
Immer vs Clone Deep
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?