Benchmark: Integer division test

HTML Preparation code:

<!--your preparation HTML code goes here-->

Script Preparation code:

function floor(a,b) {
	return Math.floor(a/b);
}

function trunc(a,b) {
    return Math.trunc(a/b);
}

function bitwiseOr(a,b){
  return (a/b) | 0;
}

function doubleNot(a,b){
 return ~~(a/b); 
}

Tests:

floor
floor(10,3)
trunc
trunc(10,3)
bitwiseOr
bitwiseOr(10,3)
doubleNot
doubleNot(10,3)

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
floor
trunc
bitwiseOr
doubleNot

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: one year ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:133.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/133.0

Browser/OS: Firefox 133 on Windows

View result in a separate tab

bitwiseOr

939.5M/s

doubleNot

893.3M/s

trunc

397.5M/s

floor

293.6M/s

View exact numbers

Test name	Executions per second
✓ bitwiseOr	939,546,688 Ops/sec
doubleNot	893,266,496 Ops/sec
trunc	397,522,752 Ops/sec
floor	293,627,904 Ops/sec

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model gpt-4o-mini, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

In the provided benchmark definition, four different approaches to performing integer division in JavaScript are being tested: `Math.floor`, `Math.trunc`, bitwise OR, and double NOT. The benchmark measures how quickly each approach can execute the division operation of `10` by `3`.

### Test Options

1. **floor(a, b)**:
   - **Function**: Uses `Math.floor` to return the largest integer less than or equal to the division result.
   - **Pros**: 
     - Accurate for all scenarios, including negative inputs.
   - **Cons**: 
     - Slightly slower compared to other methods due to function overhead and more complex calculations.

2. **trunc(a, b)**:
   - **Function**: Utilizes `Math.trunc` to return the integer part of the division, effectively discarding the decimal part.
   - **Pros**: 
     - Fast and straightforward for positive integers.
   - **Cons**: 
     - Performance can differ with negative inputs, as it truncates towards zero.

3. **bitwiseOr(a, b)**:
   - **Function**: Applies the bitwise OR operator `|` with `0` to achieve integer division.
   - **Pros**: 
     - Fastest among the tested methods because it operates at the binary level and effectively discards the decimal.
   - **Cons**: 
     - May not handle negative values as expected (rounding towards zero instead of towards negative infinity).

4. **doubleNot(a, b)**:
   - **Function**: Uses the double NOT operator `~~` to convert the division result into an integer.
   - **Pros**: 
     - Very fast and concise similar to the bitwise OR approach.
   - **Cons**: 
     - Also behaves unfavorably with negative numbers, truncating towards zero.

### Performance Results
From the benchmark results:
- **`bitwiseOr`** achieved the highest rate with approximately **939 million executions per second**, indicating that this method is highly efficient.
- **`doubleNot`** was close behind with roughly **893 million executions per second**.
- **`trunc`** followed, with around **397 million executions per second**.
- **`floor`** was the slowest at about **294 million executions per second**.

### Considerations
- **Performance vs. Accuracy**: The bitwise and double NOT methods are significantly faster but may not give the expected results for negative numbers. If the context strongly dictates accuracy with negative values, `Math.floor` or `Math.trunc` would be preferable despite their lower speed.
- **Real-World Use Cases**: When deciding which method to use, consider the nature of your data (positive vs. negative) and if speed is critical in performance-sensitive code sections.

### Alternatives
In addition to the methods tested:
- **Using Regular Expressions or String Manipulation**: Though less common for integer division, some alternatives involve converting results to strings and manipulating them; however, this comes with performance drawbacks.
- **Native Integer Support in WebAssembly**: For more performance-intensive applications, considering WebAssembly (Wasm) may be beneficial. This allows for more complex mathematical operations with potentially increased efficiency, especially for large computations.

In summary, the choice of method for integer division in JavaScript should balance performance requirements with the need for correctness based on the expected input values.

Integer division test (version: 1)

Comparing performance of: `floor vs trunc vs bitwiseOr vs doubleNot`

Created: one year ago by: Registered User

Go to the latest result

floor

trunc

bitwiseOr

doubleNot

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model gpt-4o-mini, generated one year ago):

Integer division test (version: 1)

Comparing performance of: floor vs trunc vs bitwiseOr vs doubleNot

Created: one year ago by: Registered User

Go to the latest result

floor

trunc

bitwiseOr

doubleNot

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model gpt-4o-mini, generated one year ago):

Related benchmarks

Comparing performance of: `floor vs trunc vs bitwiseOr vs doubleNot`