Benchmark: Split replace vs. regex replace (input with many matches)

HTML Preparation code:

<!--your preparation HTML code goes here-->

Script Preparation code:

const stuff = "https://https://https://https://https://randomtexthttps://https://https://randomtexthttps://https://https://https://https://randomtexthttps://https://https://https://https://randomtexthttps://https://https://https://https://randomtexthttps://https://randomtexthttps://https://https://https://randomtexthttps://https://https://https://randomtexthttps://https://https://https://randomtexthttps://https://https://https://randomtexthttps://https://https://https://https://randomtexthttps://https://https:"

Tests:

Split
stuff.split('https://').filter(Boolean).join('https://');
Regex
stuff.replace(/(https:\/\/)+/g,'https://');

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Split
Regex

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: one year ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/131.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 131 on Mac OS X 10.15.7

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
Split	2730180.8 Ops/sec
Regex	2672896.0 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks:

Split replace vs. regex replace (input with many matches) (version: 1)

Comparing performance of: Split vs Regex

Comparing performance of: Split vs Regex

Created: one year ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

Split

Regex

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A