Benchmark: Split replace vs. regex replace

HTML Preparation code:

<!--your preparation HTML ode goes here-->

Script Preparation code:

const stuff = "<p>testing subscriptions app 1</p><br><p><a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer nofollow\" class=\"link\" href=\"https://{{user_application_link}}\">{{user_application_display_name}}</a></p><br><p><span data-type=\"mention\" class=\"merge-field\" data-id=\"email_signature\"></span></p><br><p><a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" class=\"link\" href=\"https://{{user_application_link}}\">manual tag</a></p><br><p><a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" class=\"link\" href=\"https://google.com\">test</a></p> {{unsubscribe}}"

Tests:

Split
stuff.split('https://').filter(Boolean).join('https://');
Regex
stuff.replace(/(https:\/\/)+/g, 'https://');

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Split
Regex

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: one year ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/605.1.15 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/17.6 Safari/605.1.15

Browser/OS: Safari 17 on Mac OS X 10.15.7

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
Split	5694860.0 Ops/sec
Regex	399020096.0 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks:

Split replace vs. regex replace (version: 1)

Comparing performance of: Split vs Regex

Created: one year ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

Split

Regex

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A