Benchmark: intersection lodash

HTML Preparation code:

<script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/lodash@4.17.4/lodash.min.js"></script>

Script Preparation code:


var arr1 = ['sections-a', 'sections-b', 'sections-c', 'sections-d', 'sections-e', 'sections-f'];

var arr2 = ['sections-a', 'sections-b', 'sections-b', 'sections-b', 'sections-b', 'sections-b'];

Tests:

set
const arrSet = new Set(arr1) const filtered = arr2.filter( value => arrSet.has(value))
lodash
_.intersection(arr1, arr2)

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
set
lodash

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 7 months ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/140.0.0.0 Safari/537.36 Edg/140.0.0.0

Browser/OS: Chrome 140 on Windows

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
set	8249483.5 Ops/sec
lodash	3958724.5 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks:

twoja stara
twoja stara2
twoja stara3
twoja stara4
twoja stara5
lodash intersect vs filter2
lodash difference vs array filter
lodash.intersection vs Vanilla JS
Lodash vs Set Intersection vs includes vs indexOf

intersection lodash (version: 1)

Comparing performance of: set vs lodash

Created: one year ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

set

lodash

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A