Benchmark: Lodash Chain vs Native vs Lodash && vs Native && vs Flow

Tests:

Chain
_.chain(data).filter(f => f.a === 'a').filter(f => f.b === 1).filter(f => f.b + 1 === 2).map(f => f.a).filter(f => f === 'a').value()
Native (with &&)
data.filter(f => f.a === 'a' && f.b === 1 && f.b + 1 === 2).map(f => f.a).filter(f => f === 'a')
Native
data.filter(f => f.a === 'a').filter(f => f.b === 1).filter(f => f.b + 1 === 2).map(f => f.a).filter(f => f === 'a')
Flow
_.flow( _.filter(f => f.a === 'a'), _.filter(f => f.b === 1), _.filter(f => f.b + 1 === 2), _.map(f => f.a), _.filter(f => f === 'a') )(data)
Chain (with &&)
_.chain(data).filter(f => f.a === 'a' && f.b === 1 && f.b + 1 === 2).map(f => f.a).filter(f => f === 'a').value()

Historical Performance Data aggregated from 18 community runs

Desktop Results:

Chrome 9 runs

Chain (with &&)

2/s

Native (with &&)

2/s

Chain

1/s

Flow

1/s

Native

1/s

Fastest: Chain (with &&) (2.3x faster)

View exact numbers

✓ Chain (with &&): 2 ops/sec
• Native (with &&): 2 ops/sec
• Chain: 1 ops/sec
• Flow: 1 ops/sec
• Native: 1 ops/sec

Firefox 9 runs

Native (with &&)

4/s

Chain (with &&)

3/s

Native

2/s

Chain

2/s

Flow

2/s

Fastest: Native (with &&) (2.1x faster)

View exact numbers

✓ Native (with &&): 4 ops/sec
• Chain (with &&): 3 ops/sec
• Native: 2 ops/sec
• Chain: 2 ops/sec
• Flow: 2 ops/sec

Results show median performance across all community submissions. Run this benchmark yourself to verify on your device.

Test case name	Result
Chain
Native (with &&)
Native
Flow
Chain (with &&)

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 8 months ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/142.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 142 on Windows

View result in a separate tab

Native (with &&)

2/s

Chain (with &&)

2/s

Chain

1/s

Flow

1/s

Native

1/s

View exact numbers

Test name	Executions per second
✓ Native (with &&)	2 Ops/sec
Chain (with &&)	2 Ops/sec
Chain	1 Ops/sec
Flow	1 Ops/sec
Native	1 Ops/sec

Lodash Chain vs Native vs Lodash && vs Native && vs Flow (version: 1)

Comparing performance of: `Chain vs Native (with &&) vs Native vs Flow vs Chain (with &&)`

Created: one year ago by: Guest

Go to the latest result

Chain

Native (with &&)

Native

Flow

Chain (with &&)

Historical Performance Data aggregated from 18 community runs

Desktop Results:

Chrome 9 runs

Firefox 9 runs

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Lodash Chain vs Native vs Lodash && vs Native && vs Flow (version: 1)

Comparing performance of: Chain vs Native (with &&) vs Native vs Flow vs Chain (with &&)

Created: one year ago by: Guest

Go to the latest result

Chain

Native (with &&)

Native

Flow

Chain (with &&)

Historical Performance Data aggregated from 18 community runs

Desktop Results:

Chrome 9 runs

Firefox 9 runs

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Related benchmarks

Comparing performance of: `Chain vs Native (with &&) vs Native vs Flow vs Chain (with &&)`