Benchmark: Lodash Chain vs Native vs Lodash && vs Native && vs Flow

HTML Preparation code:

<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.5/lodash.min.js'></script>
<script src='https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/g/lodash@4(lodash.min.js+lodash.fp.min.js)'></script>

Script Preparation code:

var data = Array(10000000).fill({ a: 'a', b: 1 });

Tests:

Chain
_.chain(data).filter(f => f.a === 'a').filter(f => f.b === 1).filter(f => f.b + 1 === 2).map(f => f.a).filter(f => f === 'a').value()
Native (with &&)
data.filter(f => f.a === 'a' && f.b === 1 && f.b + 1 === 2).map(f => f.a).filter(f => f === 'a')
Native
data.filter(f => f.a === 'a').filter(f => f.b === 1).filter(f => f.b + 1 === 2).map(f => f.a).filter(f => f === 'a')
Flow
_.flow( _.filter(f => f.a === 'a'), _.filter(f => f.b === 1), _.filter(f => f.b + 1 === 2), _.map(f => f.a), _.filter(f => f === 'a') )(data)
Chain (with &&)
_.chain(data).filter(f => f.a === 'a' && f.b === 1 && f.b + 1 === 2).map(f => f.a).filter(f => f === 'a').value()

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Chain
Native (with &&)
Native
Flow
Chain (with &&)

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 5 months ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/142.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 142 on Windows

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
Chain	1.3 Ops/sec
Native (with &&)	2.2 Ops/sec
Native	0.5 Ops/sec
Flow	0.8 Ops/sec
Chain (with &&)	2.1 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks:

Lodash Chain vs Native vs Lodash && vs Native && vs Flow (version: 1)

Comparing performance of: Chain vs Native (with &&) vs Native vs Flow vs Chain (with &&)

Created: one year ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

Chain

Native (with &&)

Native

Flow

Chain (with &&)

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A