Toggle navigation
MeasureThat
.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Array manual search vs Regex.test (2)
(version: 1)
Comparing performance of:
Array.includes vs Regex.test
Created:
one year ago
by:
Guest
Go to the latest result
Tests:
Array.includes
const box = ['###','#*#', '###']; for(let i=1 ; i < box.length-1 ; i++) { for(let j=1 ; j < box[i].length-1 ; j++) { if(box[i][j] === '*') { return true; } } } return false;
Regex.test
const regex = /,#\*#,/; const box = ['###','#*#','###']; regex.test(box);
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Array.includes
Regex.test
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
Run details:
(Test run date:
one year ago
)
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/131.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Browser/OS:
Chrome 131 on Windows
View result in a separate tab
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
Array.includes
81.4M/s
Regex.test
4.4M/s
View exact numbers
Test name
Executions per second
✓
Array.includes
81,411,760 Ops/sec
Regex.test
4,362,096 Ops/sec
Related benchmarks
Array.includes vs String.match
Regex vs Forloop Performance
Regex vs String.includes in Array.filter v2
regex vs startWith
Regexp test VS array.every and includes
Array manual search vs Regex.test
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?