Benchmark: <script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/g/lodash@4(lodash.min.js+lodash.fp.min.js)"></script>

HTML Preparation code:

<!--your preparation HTML code goes here-->

Script Preparation code:

const intersectionBy = (arr, ...args) => {
  let iteratee = args.pop()
  if (typeof iteratee === 'string') {
    const prop = iteratee
    iteratee = item => item[prop]
  }

  return arr.filter(item1 =>
    args.every(arr2 => arr2.find(item2 => iteratee(item1) === iteratee(item2)))
  )
}

Tests:

lodash
_.intersectionBy([2.1, 1.2], [2.3, 3.4], Math.floor)
ES
intersectionBy([2.1, 1.2], [2.3, 3.4], Math.floor)

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
lodash
ES

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: one year ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/131.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 131 on Mac OS X 10.15.7

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
lodash	2072279.4 Ops/sec
ES	23488082.0 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks:

<script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/g/lodash@4(lodash.min.js+lodash.fp.min.js)"></script> (version: 1)

Comparing performance of: lodash vs ES

Created: one year ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

lodash

ES

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A