Benchmark: _.sortBy vs JS sort vs for vs forEach

HTML Preparation code:

<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.21/lodash.min.js" integrity="sha512-WFN04846sdKMIP5LKNphMaWzU7YpMyCU245etK3g/2ARYbPK9Ub18eG+ljU96qKRCWh+quCY7yefSmlkQw1ANQ==" crossorigin="anonymous" referrerpolicy="no-referrer"></script>

Script Preparation code:

var arr = [];
for (var i = 0; i < 1_000_000; i++) {
  arr.push({ value: Math.random() });
}

Tests:

Native JS sort
arr.sort((a, b) => a.value - b.value);
lodash sort
_.sortBy(arr, (arr) => arr.value);
for loop
for (let i = 0; i < arr.length; i++) { let b = arr[i].value }
forEach loop
arr.forEach(a => { let b = a.value })

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Native JS sort
lodash sort
for loop
forEach loop

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: one year ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/131.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 131 on Windows

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
Native JS sort	10.6 Ops/sec
lodash sort	3.4 Ops/sec
for loop	2.9 Ops/sec
forEach loop	20.9 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks:

_.sortBy vs JS sort vs for vs forEach (version: 1)

Comparing performance of: Native JS sort vs lodash sort vs for loop vs forEach loop

Created: one year ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

Native JS sort

lodash sort

for loop

forEach loop

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A