Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
xdddddddd
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
jquery vs js
Created:
7 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script type="text/javascript" src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/jquery/3.3.1/jquery.min.js"></script> <div id="testElement"></div>
Tests:
jquery
var el = $("#testElement")[0]; var className = el.className;
js
var el = document.getElementById('testElement'); var className = el.className;
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
jquery
js
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
gemma2:9b
, generated one year ago):
This benchmark compares two ways of getting the class name of an HTML element: using jQuery and using plain JavaScript. **Options Compared:** * **jQuery (`jquery` test):** This approach uses the jQuery library to select the HTML element with the ID "testElement" and then extract its class name. * **Plain JavaScript (`js` test):** This approach directly uses the `document.getElementById` method to get the HTML element by its ID and then accesses its `className` property. **Pros and Cons:** * **jQuery (`jquery` test):** * **Pros:** jQuery offers a more concise and often easier-to-read syntax for DOM manipulation compared to plain JavaScript. It also provides a wide range of additional functionalities beyond just selecting elements, making it a popular choice for web development. * **Cons:** jQuery adds an extra dependency to your project, which can potentially increase its size and loading time. It might not be necessary if you only need basic DOM manipulation, as plain JavaScript can achieve the same results. * **Plain JavaScript (`js` test):** * **Pros:** No external dependencies are required, leading to a smaller project footprint and faster loading times. You have direct control over the code and don't rely on any third-party library. * **Cons:** The syntax for DOM manipulation can be more verbose compared to jQuery. **Other Considerations:** * Performance: This benchmark is measuring the execution speed of each approach. The results indicate that plain JavaScript (`js` test) is slightly faster in this specific case. However, performance differences between these two methods are often negligible in real-world scenarios unless you're dealing with very large or complex DOM structures. **Alternatives:** * Libraries like React, Vue, or Angular offer their own mechanisms for handling DOM manipulation and might be more suitable if you're building a complex single-page application.
Related benchmarks:
This is a test benchmark
spread vs for of
testee
testthis
Test DOM Select
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?