Benchmark: JavaScript spread operator vs Raw

Tests:

Using the spread operator
const firstObject = { sampleData: 'Hello world' } const secondObject = { moreData: 'foo bar' } const finalObject = { ...firstObject, ...secondObject }
Using Raw
const firstObject = { sampleData: 'Hello world' } const secondObject = { moreData: 'foo bar' } const finalObject = { sampleData: firstObject.sampleData, moreData: secondObject.moreData }

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Using the spread operator
Using Raw

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

No previous run results

This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one to run it!

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's dive into explaining the provided benchmark.

**Overview**

The benchmark is designed to compare two approaches for creating a new object in JavaScript: using the spread operator (`...`) and using raw assignment with property access (`obj1.property = obj2.property;`). The goal is to determine which approach is faster, more efficient, or both.

**Options Compared**

Two options are being compared:

1. **Using the Spread Operator**: This method uses the spread operator (`...`) to create a new object by spreading two existing objects (`firstObject` and `secondObject`) into one new object (`finalObject`). The syntax looks like this: `{ ...firstObject, ...secondObject }`.
2. **Raw Assignment with Property Access**: This method uses raw assignment with property access to create a new object by assigning properties from one object (`firstObject`) to another object (`finalObject`), and then adding properties from a third object (`secondObject`). The syntax looks like this: `const finalObject = { sampleData: firstObject.sampleData, moreData: secondObject.moreData }`.

**Pros and Cons of Each Approach**

**Using the Spread Operator:**

Pros:

* More concise and readable code
* Can be easier to maintain and modify, as the spread operator allows for dynamic object creation

Cons:

* May incur a performance penalty due to the creation of an intermediate object (the `...` expression)
* May not be optimized by JavaScript engines, leading to slower execution times

**Raw Assignment with Property Access:**

Pros:

* Can potentially be faster than using the spread operator, as it avoids the creation of an intermediate object
* Can be more efficient in terms of memory usage, as it doesn't create a new object

Cons:

* More verbose and less readable code
* May be more error-prone, as there's no explicit way to merge properties from multiple objects

**Other Considerations**

When evaluating the performance difference between these two approaches, other factors come into play, such as:

* Object size: Larger objects may lead to slower execution times due to increased memory access overhead.
* Property number: More properties in an object can lead to slower execution times due to more frequent property lookups.
* Browser support: Different browsers may optimize or implement the spread operator differently, affecting performance.

**Library Used (None)**

There are no libraries used in this benchmark. The test cases use only built-in JavaScript features.

**Special JS Feature/Syntax**

The `...` syntax in the spread operator is a relatively new feature introduced in ECMAScript 2015 (ES6). It allows for concise object creation and merging.

Overall, while using the spread operator can lead to more readable code and may be more intuitive for some developers, raw assignment with property access might provide performance advantages. However, this benchmark only measures execution time, not code quality or maintainability.

Related benchmarks:

JavaScript spread operator vs Raw (version: 1)

Comparing performance of: Using the spread operator vs Using Raw

Created: 7 years ago by: Registered User

Jump to the latest result

Using the spread operator

Using Raw

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

No previous run results

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):