Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Return true vs empty body
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
emptyFunc vs trueFunc vs undefinedFunc vs nullFunc vs notDefinedFunc
Created:
9 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
var notDefined; var emptyFunc = function() {}; var trueFunc = function() { return true; } var undefinedFunc = function() { return undefined; } var nullFunc = function() { return null; } var notDefinedFunc = function() { return notDefined; }
Tests:
emptyFunc
emptyFunc();
trueFunc
trueFunc();
undefinedFunc
undefinedFunc();
nullFunc
nullFunc();
notDefinedFunc
notDefinedFunc();
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (5)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
emptyFunc
trueFunc
undefinedFunc
nullFunc
notDefinedFunc
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's dive into the world of JavaScript microbenchmarks and explore what's being tested on MeasureThat.net. **Benchmark Definition JSON** The provided JSON defines a benchmark named "Return true vs empty body". It includes two types of functions: 1. `emptyFunc`: An empty function with no code. 2. `trueFunc`, `undefinedFunc`, `nullFunc`, and `notDefinedFunc`: Functions that return a specific value when called. **Options Compared** The benchmark compares the execution times of calling these four functions. The options being compared are essentially the number of executions of each function, which affects the performance of the JavaScript engine. **Pros and Cons of Different Approaches** 1. **Empty Function (`emptyFunc`)**: This approach is likely used to test the baseline or initial state of the JavaScript engine. Since there's no code to execute, it serves as a reference point for other functions. * Pros: Quick execution time, ideal for measuring baseline performance. * Cons: May not accurately represent real-world usage. 2. **Functions with Defined Behavior (`trueFunc`, `undefinedFunc`, `nullFunc`, and `notDefinedFunc`)**: These approaches test the engine's behavior when executing code that returns a specific value. * Pros: More representative of real-world scenarios, allows for comparison of function performance. * Cons: May introduce additional overhead due to function calls and return statements. **Library Usage** There is no explicit library usage mentioned in the benchmark definition or individual test cases. However, it's essential to note that many modern JavaScript engines rely on libraries like V8 (used by Chrome) for their execution environment. **Special JS Features or Syntax** None are explicitly mentioned in this benchmark.
Related benchmarks:
Return true vs empty body
Return true vs empty body
Return true vs empty body
Return true vs return;
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?