Benchmark: array size 4 - MeasureThat.net

Tests:

undefined
let myArray = []; for (let i=0; i<102400; i++) { myArray.push("foo" + i); }
defined
let myArray = new Array(102400); for (let i=0; i<102400; i++) { myArray[i] = "foo" + i; }
defined (wrong)
let myArray = new Array(102400); for (let i=0; i<102400; i++) { myArray.push("foo" + i); }

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
undefined
defined
defined (wrong)

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

No previous run results

This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one to run it!

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's break down the provided benchmark and its various components.

**Benchmark Definition JSON**

The provided JSON represents a JavaScript microbenchmark definition. It has four main fields:

1. **Name**: This is a unique identifier for the benchmark.
2. **Description**: This field is empty in this case, but it could be used to provide a brief description of the benchmark.
3. **Script Preparation Code**: This field is also empty, which means no code needs to be executed before running the benchmark. However, this might not always be the case, and some benchmarks may require specific setup or initialization code.
4. **Html Preparation Code**: Similar to Script Preparation Code, this field is also empty, indicating that no HTML preparation code is needed.

**Individual Test Cases**

The benchmark has three test cases:

1. **undefined**: This test case uses an array literal syntax with a loop that pushes strings onto the array using the `push` method.
2. **defined**: This test case creates a new array instance using the `Array()` constructor and then uses a loop to assign values to its elements.
3. **defined (wrong)**: This test case also creates a new array instance but uses an incorrect syntax, assigning values directly to indices instead of using the indexing operator (`[]`).

**Library Used**

None of these test cases explicitly use any libraries.

**Special JavaScript Feature or Syntax**

The `push` method and array literal syntax are standard features in JavaScript. The `Array()` constructor is also a built-in function in JavaScript. There are no special JavaScript features or syntax used in these test cases.

Now, let's discuss the different approaches compared in these test cases:

1. **Using an array literal (`[]`) vs. using the `push` method**: In modern JavaScript, both approaches are supported and produce similar results. However, creating a new array instance using the `Array()` constructor (like in the `defined` case) can be more efficient for large arrays because it avoids the overhead of dynamic array growth.
2. **Direct assignment vs. indexing operator (`[]`)**: Directly assigning values to indices is generally faster and more memory-efficient than using the `push` method, especially for large arrays.

**Pros and Cons**

1. **Using an array literal (`[]`)**:
	* Pros: Can be more concise and expressive.
	* Cons: May not be as efficient for very large arrays due to dynamic growth overhead.
2. **Using the `Array()` constructor**:
	* Pros: Can be more efficient for large arrays because it avoids dynamic growth overhead.
	* Cons: Can be less concise and may require more code.
3. **Direct assignment vs. indexing operator (`[]`)**:
	* Direct assignment is generally faster and more memory-efficient, but it can be error-prone if not used carefully.
	* Indexing operator usage provides a safer way to access array elements, reducing the risk of out-of-bounds errors.

**Other Alternatives**

Some alternative approaches could be explored:

1. **Using `Array.from()`**: This method creates a new array from an iterable sequence (like an array literal or a string). It can be more concise than using the `push` method.
2. **Using `Array.prototype.set()`**: Some browsers support the `set()` method on arrays, which can be used to assign values to indices in a single operation.

Keep in mind that the best approach will depend on the specific requirements and constraints of your use case.

Related benchmarks:

array size 4 (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: undefined vs defined vs defined (wrong)

Created: 7 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

undefined

defined

defined (wrong)

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

No previous run results

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):