Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Init array with fill map, vs for i loop
(version: 0)
People tend to use array fil and then foreach, we know foreach is faster than a for loop, but is it also faster if you use array fill first?
Comparing performance of:
for vs fill and map
Created:
one year ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
var iterations = 10000;
Tests:
for
res = [] for (i = 0; i < iterations; i++) { res.push(i); }
fill and map
res = Array(iterations).fill(null).map((value, index) => index);
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
for
fill and map
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
Run details:
(Test run date:
one year ago
)
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:131.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/131.0
Browser/OS:
Firefox 131 on Windows
View result in a separate tab
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
<iframe src="https://measurethat.net/Embed?id=562874" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>
Test name
Executions per second
for
3575.7 Ops/sec
fill and map
8796.1 Ops/sec
Related benchmarks:
Array loop vs for of loop vs foreach vs map
Array loop vs for of loop vs foreach vs map (2)
foreach vs some vs for..of vs for with length vs map
Array loop vs foreach vs map populate array
Array loop: forEach vs for vs map vs for of entries
Array loop vs foreach vs map with large array
my Array loop vs foreach vs map
Array loop vs foreach vs map (cached length)
Array loop vs for of loop vs foreach vs map fixed
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?