Benchmark: MAGENTA PutImageData vs fillRect

HTML Preparation code:

<canvas id='pid' width='256' height='256'></canvas>
<canvas id='rect' width='256' height='256'></canvas>

Script Preparation code:

var pid = document.getElementById('pid').getContext('2d');
var rect = document.getElementById('rect').getContext('2d');

var imgData = new ImageData(256,256)
for (let i = 0; i <imgData.length; i+=4) { imgData[i] = 255; imgData[i+2] = 255; }

Tests:

putImageData
pid.putImageData(imgData,0,0);
rect
rect.fillStyle = "magenta"; rect.fillRect(0,0,256,256);

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
putImageData
rect

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: one year ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/130.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 130 on Windows

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
putImageData	15566.2 Ops/sec
rect	1105092.6 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks:

MAGENTA PutImageData vs fillRect (version: 0)

GetImageData with PutImageData vs just DrawImage

Comparing performance of: putImageData vs rect

Created: one year ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

putImageData

rect

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A