Benchmark: RegEx.test vs. String.includes vs. String.match for multiple results version 3

Script Preparation code:

var text = "Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. In leo diam, ornare volutpat nulla eget, porta ullamcorper risus. Ut rutrum quam enim, eget tempus urna molestie et. Pellentesque quis arcu nulla. Duis sed leo scelerisque, semper nisi nec, rhoncus elit. Fusce at ligula id elit semper congue. Pellentesque habitant morbi tristique senectus et netus et malesuada fames ac turpis egestas. Proin sit amet nulla id magna euismod iaculis a id dolor. Vivamus eget neque aliquet, placerat magna id, tincidunt mi. Nulla eu dui ac turpis condimentum congue et at erat. ";
var searchStrings = ['Pellentesque', 'pellentesque', 'PELLENTESQUE'];
var pattern = /pellentesque/i;

Tests:

RegEx.test
pattern.test(text);
String.includes
text.includes(searchStrings[0]) || text.includes(searchStrings[1]);
match
text.match(pattern)

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
RegEx.test
String.includes
match

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: one year ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:131.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/131.0

Browser/OS: Firefox 131 on Windows

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
RegEx.test	21394288.0 Ops/sec
String.includes	1408491008.0 Ops/sec
match	15167264.0 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks:

RegEx.test vs. String.includes vs. String.match for multiple results version 3 (version: 2)

Comparing performance of: RegEx.test vs String.includes vs match

Created: one year ago by: Registered User

Jump to the latest result

RegEx.test

String.includes

match

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A