Toggle navigation
MeasureThat
.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
jquery ajax v fetch
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
jquery ajax vs fetch
Created:
one year ago
by:
Guest
Go to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src='https://code.jquery.com/jquery-3.6.0.min.js'></script>
Tests:
jquery ajax
function getDataViaJQAjax() { $.ajax({ type: "GET", url: "https://discovery.googleapis.com/discovery/v1/apis", success: console.log, data: null, }) } getDataViaJQAjax()
fetch
async function getDataViaFetch() { try { const response = await fetch("https://discovery.googleapis.com/discovery/v1/apis") const json = await response.json() console.log(json) } catch (error) { console.error(error.message) } } getDataViaFetch()
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
jquery ajax
fetch
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
Run details:
(Test run date:
one year ago
)
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/128.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Browser/OS:
Chrome 128 on Windows
View result in a separate tab
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
<iframe src="https://measurethat.net/Embed?id=560480" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>
fetch
1K/s
jquery ajax
1K/s
View exact numbers
Test name
Executions per second
✓
fetch
1,113 Ops/sec
jquery ajax
1,102 Ops/sec
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided JSON data and explain what's being tested, compared, and analyzed. **What is being tested?** The benchmark tests two different approaches for making HTTP requests: jQuery Ajax and Fetch API. * jQuery Ajax is an older library that provides a simple way to make HTTP requests in JavaScript. * Fetch API is a built-in JavaScript API introduced in 2015, which allows making HTTP requests without the need for additional libraries. **What options are compared?** The benchmark compares the performance of: 1. jQuery Ajax (using `$.ajax()`) 2. Fetch API (using `fetch()`) These two approaches have different characteristics that affect their performance: * **jQuery Ajax**: Requires loading an external library, which can add latency to the test. It also has a lot of overhead due to its complex internal workings. * **Fetch API**: Is a built-in JavaScript API, so it doesn't require any additional libraries or downloads. However, it may have slightly slower execution times due to its smaller codebase. **Pros and Cons:** **jQuery Ajax:** Pros: * Has been widely adopted and is well-maintained * Provides more features and flexibility than Fetch API Cons: * Adds extra latency due to the need for an external library * Has a lot of overhead due to its internal workings **Fetch API:** Pros: * Is built-in to JavaScript, reducing latency and overhead * Smaller codebase makes it potentially faster to execute Cons: * Less widely adopted than jQuery Ajax * May have fewer features and less flexibility **Library Used:** In this benchmark, the jQuery library is used for the `$.ajax()` method. jQuery is a popular JavaScript library that provides many useful features, including DOM manipulation, event handling, and HTTP requests. **Special JS Feature or Syntax:** This benchmark does not use any special JavaScript features or syntax that would be unique to modern browsers or ECMAScript versions. **Other Considerations:** When choosing between these two approaches, consider the trade-offs: * If you need more features and flexibility, jQuery Ajax might be a better choice. * If you prioritize performance and don't need advanced features, Fetch API might be a better option. **Alternative Options:** There are other options for making HTTP requests in JavaScript, such as: 1. **XMLHttpRequest**: An older, built-in JavaScript API that provides similar functionality to jQuery Ajax and Fetch API. 2. **Axios**: A popular third-party library that provides a more modern and flexible alternative to jQuery Ajax. 3. **Node.js**: Can be used for making HTTP requests using the `http` module or external libraries like Axios. These alternatives may have different performance characteristics, feature sets, and usage patterns compared to jQuery Ajax and Fetch API.
Related benchmarks
jQuery AJAX vs Fetch API
new fetch vs ajax call
fetch vs ajax call V2
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?