Toggle navigation
MeasureThat
.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
Feature Requests
FAQ
Register
Log In
comparison int and string
(version: 0)
Benchmark.js
Comparing performance of: int comparison vs string compare
Comparing performance of:
int vs string
Created:
one year ago
by:
Guest
Go to the latest result
Tests:
int
const a = 1582804062513 const b = 1582804062513 console.log(b === a)
string
const a = "1582804062513" const b = "1582804062513" console.log(b === a)
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
int
string
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
Run details:
(Test run date:
one year ago
)
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/605.1.15 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/18.4 Safari/605.1.15
Browser/OS:
Safari 18 on Mac OS X 10.15.7
View result in a separate tab
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
string
1.9M/s
int
1.9M/s
View exact numbers
Test name
Executions per second
✓
string
1,934,003 Ops/sec
int
1,860,818 Ops/sec
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's dive into explaining the provided benchmark. **Benchmark Overview** The benchmark is designed to compare the performance of integer comparisons (int) versus string comparisons in JavaScript. The test creates two variables, `a` and `b`, which are either integers or strings with the same value, and then checks if they are equal using the `===` operator. This simple yet meaningful scenario allows us to isolate the performance differences between int and string comparisons. **Options Compared** Two options are being compared: 1. **Integer Comparison (int)**: When `a` and `b` are integers. 2. **String Comparison (string)**: When `a` and `b` are strings. **Pros and Cons of Each Approach** * **Integer Comparison (int)**: + Pros: - Typically faster than string comparisons, as they involve a simple arithmetic operation (bitwise comparison). - Less memory allocation and garbage collection overhead. + Cons: - May not cover real-world scenarios where numbers need to be compared as strings (e.g., dates or UUIDs). * **String Comparison (string)**: + Pros: - Suitable for comparing numbers as strings, especially when working with legacy systems or specific use cases (e.g., date formatting). + Cons: - Generally slower than integer comparisons due to the overhead of string operations (alphabetical sorting, character indexing). **Library and Purpose** There is no explicit library mentioned in the benchmark definition. However, it's likely that the built-in JavaScript `===` operator is being used for both comparisons. **Special JS Feature or Syntax** None are explicitly mentioned in this particular benchmark. If any special features or syntax were involved (e.g., ES6 features), they would be described here. **Other Considerations** * **Real-world implications**: This benchmark might not accurately represent real-world scenarios where numbers need to be compared as strings. * **Browser variations**: The results are based on a single browser version (Firefox 133). Different browsers, versions, or platforms may exhibit different performance characteristics. **Alternatives** If you wanted to explore alternative approaches or variations of this benchmark: 1. Compare string comparisons using Unicode characters instead of standard ASCII characters. 2. Use different comparison operators (e.g., `==`, `!=`, `===`, etc.) and analyze the performance differences. 3. Incorporate more complex data types (e.g., objects, arrays) into the comparisons to simulate real-world scenarios. 4. Experiment with different browsers or versions to assess platform-specific performance variations. By understanding these factors, you can better interpret the benchmark results and consider the implications for your own development work.
Related benchmarks
BigInt vs ParseInt
Which equals operator (== vs ===) is faster (string vs int)?
Number.isInteger() vs typeof
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?