Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Fastest way to check if object is empty using length 2
(version: 0)
You don't need to make add for loops in your test scenarios, the benchmark does it itself.
Comparing performance of:
object.keys() vs JSON.stringify() vs For loop
Created:
one year ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
var xxx = {}
Tests:
object.keys()
Object.keys(xxx) === 0
JSON.stringify()
JSON.stringify(xxx) === "{}"
For loop
for (var key in xxx) { if (hasOwnProperty.call(value, key)) { return false; } }
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (3)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
object.keys()
JSON.stringify()
For loop
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
Run details:
(Test run date:
one year ago
)
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/129.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Browser/OS:
Chrome 129 on Mac OS X 10.15.7
View result in a separate tab
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
Test name
Executions per second
object.keys()
10189637.0 Ops/sec
JSON.stringify()
8160203.0 Ops/sec
For loop
24137856.0 Ops/sec
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's dive into the world of JavaScript microbenchmarks and analyze the provided benchmark definition. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark definition is a JSON object that contains the details of the test case. Here's what it tells us: * The test aims to find the fastest way to check if an object is empty using a length 2 approach. * The script preparation code is `var xxx = {}`, which creates an empty object named `xxx`. * There are three individual test cases: 1. `object.keys()`: Checks if the object has any keys using the `keys()` method. 2. `JSON.stringify(xxx) === "{}"`: Checks if the JSON string representation of the object is equal to `{}`. 3. `For loop`: Uses a for loop to check if the object has any properties. **Test Case Analysis** Let's analyze each test case: 1. **`object.keys()`**: This method returns an array of all the property names contained in the object. If the object is empty, it returns an empty array (`[]`). The benchmark measures how fast this method can check if the object has any keys. 2. **`JSON.stringify(xxx) === "{}",`**: JSON stringification creates a string representation of the object. If the object is empty, it should be equal to `{}`. The benchmark measures how fast this method can compare the JSON string with an empty string. 3. **`For loop`**: This test case uses a for loop to check if the object has any properties. It iterates over each property in the object and checks if the property is present using `hasOwnProperty.call(value, key)`. The benchmark measures how fast this method can iterate over the object's properties. **Library and Special JS Features** * None of the test cases use a specific JavaScript library. * There are no special JavaScript features or syntax used in these test cases. **Pros and Cons of Different Approaches** Here are some pros and cons of each approach: 1. **`object.keys()`**: * Pros: Fast, simple, and widely supported. * Cons: May not work correctly with objects that have non-enumerable properties. 2. **`JSON.stringify(xxx) === "{}",`**: * Pros: Works well with most objects, but can be slow for very large objects due to stringification overhead. * Cons: Not suitable for objects with non-serializable properties or large numbers of nested objects. 3. **`For loop`**: * Pros: Can handle complex object structures and non-enumerable properties. * Cons: May be slower than the other two approaches, especially for large objects. **Other Alternatives** Some alternative methods to check if an object is empty include: 1. `Object.keys(xxx).length === 0` (similar to `object.keys()`, but uses a direct property access) 2. `xxx.length === 0` (works well with objects, but may not work correctly with non-array-like objects) 3. `Object.getOwnPropertyNames(xxx).length === 0` (uses `getOwnPropertyNames()` to check for non-enumerable properties) These alternatives can be used as part of the benchmark to provide more comprehensive results. I hope this explanation helps you understand the JavaScript microbenchmark and its different test cases!
Related benchmarks:
Fastest way to check if object is empty
Fastest way to check if object is empty (for in vs.
Fastest way to check if object is empty - EP3
Fastest way to check if object is empty using length
Fastest way to check if object is empty using length 3
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?